linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97c87eb3-5b95-c848-8c50-ed7b535220b0@eikelenboom.it>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:11:37 +0200
From:   Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To:     Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, gluster-devel@...ster.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer
 capacity (take 2)

On 12/06/2019 13:25, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:28 PM Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Miklos, would 4K -> `sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` for
>>> header room change be accepted?
>>
>> Yes, next cycle.   For 4.2 I'll just push the revert.
> 
> Thanks Miklos. Please consider queuing the following patch for 5.3.
> Sander, could you please confirm that glusterfs is not broken with this
> version of the check?
> 
> Thanks beforehand,
> Kirill

Sure will give it a spin this evening and report back.

--
Sander