[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-699785f5d898965408430e841d10cd1cb2c02a77@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 05:32:40 -0700
From: tip-bot for Daniel Lezcano <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:irq/core] genirq/timings: Add selftest for next event
computation
Commit-ID: 699785f5d898965408430e841d10cd1cb2c02a77
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/699785f5d898965408430e841d10cd1cb2c02a77
Author: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 27 May 2019 22:55:21 +0200
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:47:05 +0200
genirq/timings: Add selftest for next event computation
The circular buffers are now validated with selftests. The next interrupt
index algorithm which is the hardest part to validate needs extra coverage.
Add a selftest which uses the intervals stored in the arrays and insert all
the values except the last one. The next event computation must return the
same value as the last element which was not inserted.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527205521.12091-9-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
---
kernel/irq/timings.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
index 5b13c2231d4f..e960d7ce7bcc 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/timings.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -704,6 +704,68 @@ static struct timings_intervals tis[] __initdata = {
{ intervals4, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals4) },
};
+static int __init irq_timings_test_next_index(struct timings_intervals *ti)
+{
+ int _buffer[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+ int buffer[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+ int index, start, i, count, period_max;
+
+ count = ti->count - 1;
+
+ period_max = count > (3 * PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX) ?
+ PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX : count / 3;
+
+ /*
+ * Inject all values except the last one which will be used
+ * to compare with the next index result.
+ */
+ pr_debug("index suite: ");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ index = irq_timings_interval_index(ti->intervals[i]);
+ _buffer[i & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK] = index;
+ pr_cont("%d ", index);
+ }
+
+ start = count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ? 0 :
+ count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
+
+ count = min_t(int, count, IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ int index = (start + i) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
+ buffer[i] = _buffer[index];
+ }
+
+ index = irq_timings_next_event_index(buffer, count, period_max);
+ i = irq_timings_interval_index(ti->intervals[ti->count - 1]);
+
+ if (index != i) {
+ pr_err("Expected (%d) and computed (%d) next indexes differ\n",
+ i, index);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_next_index_selftest(void)
+{
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tis); i++) {
+
+ pr_info("---> Injecting intervals number #%d (count=%zd)\n",
+ i, tis[i].count);
+
+ ret = irq_timings_test_next_index(&tis[i]);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __init irq_timings_test_irqs(struct timings_intervals *ti)
{
struct irqt_stat __percpu *s;
@@ -875,6 +937,10 @@ static int __init irq_timings_selftest(void)
goto out;
ret = irq_timings_irqs_selftest();
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ ret = irq_timings_next_index_selftest();
out:
pr_info("---------- selftest end with %s -----------\n",
ret ? "failure" : "success");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists