linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190612133306.10231-5-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:33:06 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

Let's use the error value that is typically used if HW support is not
available when trying to load a module - this is also what systemd's
systemd-modules-load.service expects.

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c   | 2 +-
 arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c | 2 +-
 arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
index 009572e8276d..7c15542d3685 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha1_s390.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static struct shash_alg alg = {
 static int __init sha1_s390_init(void)
 {
 	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_1))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	return crypto_register_shash(&alg);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
index 62833a1d8724..af7505148f80 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha256_s390.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int __init sha256_s390_init(void)
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_256))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha256_alg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
index be589c340d15..ad29db085a18 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/sha512_s390.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int __init init(void)
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!cpacf_query_func(CPACF_KIMD, CPACF_KIMD_SHA_512))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		return -ENODEV;
 	if ((ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha512_alg)) < 0)
 		goto out;
 	if ((ret = crypto_register_shash(&sha384_alg)) < 0)
-- 
2.21.0