[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16b4bfb39e0.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:58:05 +0200
From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Double Lo <double.lo@...ress.com>, <briannorris@...omium.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Naveen Gupta <naveen.gupta@...ress.com>,
Madhan Mohan R <madhanmohan.r@...ress.com>,
<mka@...omium.org>, Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
"Chi-Hsien Lin" <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] brcmfmac: sdio: Disable auto-tuning around commands expected to fail
On 6/12/2019 1:48 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 13:11, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/12/2019 12:10 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c:
>>>> mmc_set_data_timeout(md, func->card);
>>>> mmc_wait_for_req(func->card->host, mr);
>>> These are not okay, none of these things calls should really be done
>>> from an SDIO func driver.
>>>
>>> It tells me that the func driver is a doing workaround for something
>>> that should be managed in a common way.
>>
>> We are using some low-level functions passing chain of skbuff to the
>> device using CMD53 with scatterlist. If I recall correctly Marvell made
>> an attempt to have a similar function for it in the mmc stack. Not sure
>> if that ever made it in. If so I can rework our driver using that API.
>> If not, I can make a new attempt.
>
> I recall there were some patches, but not sure why we didn't merge them.
>
> Anyway, if you want to move this forward, that would be awesome!
Let's scope it before moving forward. Our use-case is to transfer a
chain of skbuff's. I am pretty sure that is not something we want to
deal with in mmc stack api. So I suppose passing a scatterlist is more
sensible, right? Maybe on sdio layer of the stack we could consider
dealing with skbuff's for network func drivers?
Let me see if I can find those Marvell patches. Might be a good start.
Regards,
Arend
Powered by blists - more mailing lists