[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8185a8b8-a0ce-4a86-84a2-b51391356052@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:24:51 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dma: qcom: hidma: no need to check return value of
debugfs_create functions
On 6/12/2019 8:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> Also, because there is no need to save the file dentry, remove the
> variables that were saving them as they were never even being used once
> set.
>
> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Interesting. Wouldn't debugfs_create_file() blow up if dir is NULL
for some reason?
+ debugfs_create_file("stats", S_IRUGO, dir, chan,
+ &hidma_chan_fops);
Note that code ignores the return value of hidma_debug_init();
It was just trying to do clean up on debugfs failure by calling
debugfs_remove_recursive(dmadev->debugfs);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists