linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm/tlb: Optimize local TLB flushes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:48:09 -0700
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm/tlb: Optimize local TLB flushes

While the updated smp infrastructure is capable of running a function on
a single local core, it is not optimized for this case. The multiple
function calls and the indirect branch introduce some overhead, making
local TLB flushes slower than they were before the recent changes.

Before calling the SMP infrastructure, check if only a local TLB flush
is needed to restore the lost performance in this common case. This
requires to check mm_cpumask() another time, but unless this mask is
updated very frequently, this should impact performance negatively.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index db73d5f1dd43..ceb03b8cad32 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -815,8 +815,12 @@ static void flush_tlb_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *cpumask,
 			      const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
 {
 	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	bool flush_others = false;
 
-	if (static_branch_likely(&flush_tlb_multi_enabled)) {
+	if (cpumask_any_but(cpumask, this_cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
+		flush_others = true;
+
+	if (static_branch_likely(&flush_tlb_multi_enabled) && flush_others) {
 		flush_tlb_multi(cpumask, info);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -828,7 +832,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *cpumask,
 		local_irq_enable();
 	}
 
-	if (cpumask_any_but(cpumask, this_cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
+	if (flush_others)
 		flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1