lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkPQyK3oJk0qPQyfwVcvtdBSF6oN83VOW8kcy3zWyBkgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:55:18 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     cernekee@...omium.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tas571x: Fix -Wunused-const-variable

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM 'Nathan Huckleberry' via Clang Built
Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> Since tac5711_controls is identical to tas5721_controls we can just swap
> them

380 static const struct snd_kcontrol_new tas5711_controls[] = {
381   SOC_SINGLE_TLV("Master Volume",
382            TAS571X_MVOL_REG,
383            0, 0xff, 1, tas5711_volume_tlv),
384   SOC_DOUBLE_R_TLV("Speaker Volume",
385        TAS571X_CH1_VOL_REG,
386        TAS571X_CH2_VOL_REG,
387        0, 0xff, 1, tas5711_volume_tlv),
388   SOC_DOUBLE("Speaker Switch",
389        TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_REG,
390        TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_CH1_SHIFT, TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_CH2_SHIFT,
391        1, 1),
392 };

vs

666 static const struct snd_kcontrol_new tas5721_controls[] = {
667   SOC_SINGLE_TLV("Master Volume",
668            TAS571X_MVOL_REG,
669            0, 0xff, 1, tas5711_volume_tlv),
670   SOC_DOUBLE_R_TLV("Speaker Volume",
671        TAS571X_CH1_VOL_REG,
672        TAS571X_CH2_VOL_REG,
673        0, 0xff, 1, tas5711_volume_tlv),
674   SOC_DOUBLE("Speaker Switch",
675        TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_REG,
676        TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_CH1_SHIFT, TAS571X_SOFT_MUTE_CH2_SHIFT,
677        1, 1),
678 };

Thanks for the patch!

Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

Alternatively, we could make 2 variables w/ the same variable, 1
variable.  It seems there's at least 4 `_control` variables:
tas5711_controls
tas5707_controls
tas5717_controls
tas5721_controls

so maybe `tas57X1_controls` would be appropriate?  Not sure if the
maintainers have a preference here?

(Looks like L669 also refers to tas5711, but it seems there no tas5721
equivalent for `_volume_tlv`.)
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ