[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190613134800.GA12791@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:48:00 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
"selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"npmccallum@...hat.com" <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@...el.com>,
"Katz-zamir, Shay" <shay.katz-zamir@...el.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
"Tricca, Philip B" <philip.b.tricca@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 06:37:10PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:14:04PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 5, 2019, at 8:17 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 10:10:22PM +0000, Xing, Cedric wrote:
> > >> A bit off topic here. This mmap()/mprotect() discussion reminds me a
> > >> question (guess for Jarkko): Now that vma->vm_file->private_data keeps
> > >> a pointer to the enclave, why do we store it again in vma->vm_private?
> > >> It isn't a big deal but non-NULL vm_private does prevent mprotect()
> > >> from merging adjacent VMAs.
> > >
> > > Same semantics as with a regular mmap i.e. you can close the file and
> > > still use the mapping.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The file should be properly refcounted — vm_file should not go away while it’s mapped.
mm already takes care of that so vm_file does not go away. Still
we need an internal refcount for enclaves to synchronize with the
swapper. In summary nothing needs to be done.
> Right, makes sense. It is easy one to change essentially just removing
> internal refcount from sgx_encl and using file for the same. I'll update
> this to my tree along with the changes to remove LKM/ACPI bits ASAP.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists