linux-kernel - [PATCH 18/43] KVM: nVMX: Don't rewrite GUEST_PML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1560445409-17363-19-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:03:04 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 18/43] KVM: nVMX: Don't rewrite GUEST_PML_INDEX during nested VM-Entry

From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>

Emulation of GUEST_PML_INDEX for a nested VMM is a bit weird.  Because
L0 flushes the PML on every VM-Exit, the value in vmcs02 at the time of
VM-Enter is a constant -1, regardless of what L1 thinks/wants.

Fixes: 09abe32002665 ("KVM: nVMX: split pieces of prepare_vmcs02() to prepare_vmcs02_early()")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index fee297a5edda..01275cbd7478 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -1940,8 +1940,17 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_constant_state(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
 		vmcs_write64(MSR_BITMAP, __pa(vmx->nested.vmcs02.msr_bitmap));
 
-	if (enable_pml)
+	/*
+	 * The PML address never changes, so it is constant in vmcs02.
+	 * Conceptually we want to copy the PML index from vmcs01 here,
+	 * and then back to vmcs01 on nested vmexit.  But since we flush
+	 * the log and reset GUEST_PML_INDEX on each vmexit, the PML
+	 * index is also effectively constant in vmcs02.
+	 */
+	if (enable_pml) {
 		vmcs_write64(PML_ADDRESS, page_to_phys(vmx->pml_pg));
+		vmcs_write16(GUEST_PML_INDEX, PML_ENTITY_NUM - 1);
+	}
 
 	if (cpu_has_vmx_encls_vmexit())
 		vmcs_write64(ENCLS_EXITING_BITMAP, -1ull);
@@ -2102,16 +2111,6 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 	vm_exit_controls_init(vmx, exec_control);
 
 	/*
-	 * Conceptually we want to copy the PML address and index from
-	 * vmcs01 here, and then back to vmcs01 on nested vmexit. But,
-	 * since we always flush the log on each vmexit and never change
-	 * the PML address (once set), this happens to be equivalent to
-	 * simply resetting the index in vmcs02.
-	 */
-	if (enable_pml)
-		vmcs_write16(GUEST_PML_INDEX, PML_ENTITY_NUM - 1);
-
-	/*
 	 * Interrupt/Exception Fields
 	 */
 	if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending) {
-- 
1.8.3.1