linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/22] mm: remove the struct hmm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190613184631.GO22062@mellanox.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:46:36 +0000
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] mm: remove the struct hmm_device infrastructure

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:43:05AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This code is a trivial wrapper around device model helpers, which
> should have been integrated into the driver device model usage from
> the start.  Assuming it actually had users, which it never had since
> the code was added more than 1 1/2 years ago.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>  include/linux/hmm.h | 20 ------------
>  mm/hmm.c            | 80 ---------------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 100 deletions(-)

I haven't looked in detail at this device memory stuff.. But I did
check a bit through the mailing list archives for some clue what this
was supposed to be for (wow, this is from 2016!)

The commit that added this says:
  This introduce a dummy HMM device class so device driver can use it to
  create hmm_device for the sole purpose of registering device memory.

Which I just can't understand at all. 

If we need a 'struct device' for some 'device memory' purpose then it
probably ought to be the 'struct pci_device' holding the BAR, not a
fake device.

I also can't comprehend why a supposed fake device would need a
chardev, with a stanadrd 'hmm_deviceX' name, without also defining a
core kernel ABI for that char dev..

If this comes back it needs a proper explanation and review, with a
user.

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>

Jason