lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:20:04 -0400 From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com> To: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: roberto.sassu@...wei.com, vgoyal@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/3] Call ima_kexec_cmdline to measure the cmdline args On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 15:15 -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > During soft reboot(kexec_file_load) boot cmdline args Any reason for not spelling it out and using the "boot command line"? > are not measured.Thus the new kernel on load boots with > an assumption of cold reboot. Double spaces after a period. What does "boots with an assumption of cold reboot" mean? Not all systems are booted the same way. Is this comment relevant? > > This patch makes a call to the ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline, > added in "Define a new IMA hook to measure the boot command > line arguments" "added in ..." is unnecessry. > to measure the boot cmdline args into the ima log. ^IMA measurement list. Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists