[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190613213915.GE32404@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:39:16 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM in
gup fast path
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:45:01PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> FOLL_LONGTERM suggests a pin which is going to be given to hardware and
> can't move. It would truncate CMA permanently and should be excluded.
>
> FOLL_LONGTERM has already been checked in the slow path, but not checked in
> the fast path, which means a possible leak of CMA page to longterm pinned
> requirement through this crack.
>
> Place a check in gup_pte_range() in the fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 766ae54..de1b03f 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1757,6 +1757,14 @@ static int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pte_pfn(pte)));
> page = pte_page(pte);
>
> + /*
> + * FOLL_LONGTERM suggests a pin given to hardware. Prevent it
> + * from truncating CMA area
> + */
> + if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> + is_migrate_cma_page(page))
> + goto pte_unmap;
> +
> head = try_get_compound_head(page, 1);
> if (!head)
> goto pte_unmap;
> @@ -1900,6 +1908,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t orig, pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> refs++;
> } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>
> + if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> + is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
> + *nr -= refs;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Why can't we place this check before the while loop and skip subtracting the
page count?
Can is_migrate_cma_page() operate on any "subpage" of a compound page?
Here this calls is_magrate_cma_page() on the tail page of the compound page.
I'm not an expert on compound pages nor cma handling so is this ok?
It seems like you need to call is_migrate_cma_page() on each page within the
while loop?
> head = try_get_compound_head(pmd_page(orig), refs);
> if (!head) {
> *nr -= refs;
> @@ -1941,6 +1955,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pud(pud_t orig, pud_t *pudp, unsigned long addr,
> refs++;
> } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>
> + if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> + is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
> + *nr -= refs;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Same comment here.
> head = try_get_compound_head(pud_page(orig), refs);
> if (!head) {
> *nr -= refs;
> @@ -1978,6 +1998,12 @@ static int gup_huge_pgd(pgd_t orig, pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr,
> refs++;
> } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>
> + if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> + is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
> + *nr -= refs;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
And here.
Ira
> head = try_get_compound_head(pgd_page(orig), refs);
> if (!head) {
> *nr -= refs;
> --
> 2.7.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists