| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jD9Ln1+fUJHCRxRu4ZYtnesah3+cohysGr5jbxSwyrXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:46:56 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:38 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:14:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Commit d491f2b75237 ("PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue")
> > attempted to avoid a problem with devices whose drivers want them to
> > stay in D0 over suspend-to-idle and resume, but it did not go as far
> > as it should with that.
> >
> > Namely, first of all, it is questionable to change the power state
> > of a PCI bridge with a device in D0 under it, but that is not
> > actively prevented from happening during system-wide PM transitions,
> > so use the skip_bus_pm flag introduced by commit d491f2b75237 for
> > that.
>
> I think it's more than questionable. I think a bridge is *required*
> to be in D0 if any downstream device is in D0. Based on the PCI PM
> spec r1.2, sec 6, table 6-1, if the bridge is not in D0, there can be
> no PCI transactions on its secondary bus.
Fair enough.
> > Second, the configuration of devices left in D0 (whatever the reason)
> > during suspend-to-idle need not be changed and attempting to put them
> > into D0 again by force may confuse some firmware, so explicitly avoid
> > doing that.
>
> I don't know what to do with "may confuse some firmware"; it doesn't
> say what firmware is affected or why, so it sort of leads to "we can
> never touch this code because we don't know what might break."
>
> But IMO the first reason by itself is more than enough to keep a
> bridge in D0 if any downstream device is in D0.
OK, so I'll replace the phrase "may confuse some firmware" with "is pointless".
> > Fixes: d491f2b75237 ("PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue")
> > Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Tested on Dell XPS13 9360 with no issues.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void pci_pm_default_resume_early(
> > pci_power_up(pci_dev);
> > pci_restore_state(pci_dev);
> > pci_pme_restore(pci_dev);
> > - pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -842,18 +841,16 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct d
> >
> > if (pci_dev->skip_bus_pm) {
> > /*
> > - * The function is running for the second time in a row without
> > + * Either the device is a bridge with a child in D0 below it, or
> > + * the function is running for the second time in a row without
> > * going through full resume, which is possible only during
> > - * suspend-to-idle in a spurious wakeup case. Moreover, the
> > - * device was originally left in D0, so its power state should
> > - * not be changed here and the device register values saved
> > - * originally should be restored on resume again.
> > + * suspend-to-idle in a spurious wakeup case. The device should
> > + * be in D0 at this point, but if it is a bridge, it may be
> > + * necessary to save its state.
> > */
> > - pci_dev->state_saved = true;
> > - } else if (pci_dev->state_saved) {
> > - if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
> > - pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > - } else {
> > + if (!pci_dev->state_saved)
> > + pci_save_state(pci_dev);
> > + } else if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
> > pci_save_state(pci_dev);
> > if (pci_power_manageable(pci_dev))
> > pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
> > @@ -862,6 +859,22 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct d
> > dev_dbg(dev, "PCI PM: Suspend power state: %s\n",
> > pci_power_name(pci_dev->current_state));
> >
> > + if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0) {
> > + pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > + /*
> > + * Changing the power state of a PCI bridge with a device in D0
> > + * below it is questionable, so avoid doing that by setting the
> > + * skip_bus_pm flag for the parent bridge.
>
> Maybe "Per PCI PM r1.2, table 6-1, a bridge must be in D0 if any
> downstream device is in D0"?
OK
> > + */
> > + if (pci_dev->bus->self)
> > + pci_dev->bus->self->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pci_dev->skip_bus_pm && !pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "PCI PM: Skipped\n");
> > + goto Fixup;
> > + }
> > +
> > pci_pm_set_unknown_state(pci_dev);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -909,7 +922,16 @@ static int pci_pm_resume_noirq(struct de
> > if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
> > pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> >
> > - pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > + /*
> > + * In the suspend-to-idle case, devices left in D0 during suspend will
> > + * stay in D0, so it is not necessary to restore or update their
> > + * configuration here and attempting to put them into D0 again may
> > + * confuse some firmware, so avoid doing that.
> > + */
> > + if (!pci_dev->skip_bus_pm || pm_suspend_via_firmware())
> > + pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > +
> > + pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> >
> > if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> > return pci_legacy_resume_early(dev);
> > @@ -1200,6 +1222,7 @@ static int pci_pm_restore_noirq(struct d
> > }
> >
> > pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > + pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> >
> > if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> > return pci_legacy_resume_early(dev);
> >
I'll send a v2 shortly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists