linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: talitos - move struct talitos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:32:16 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: talitos - move struct talitos_edesc into
 talitos.h



Le 13/06/2019 à 14:24, Horia Geanta a écrit :
> On 6/13/2019 3:16 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 13/06/2019 à 14:13, Horia Geanta a écrit :
>>> On 6/11/2019 5:39 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Next patch will require struct talitos_edesc to be defined
>>>> earlier in talitos.c
>>>>
>>>> This patch moves it into talitos.h so that it can be used
>>>> from any place in talitos.c
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 37b5e8897eb5 ("crypto: talitos - chain in buffered data for ahash on SEC1")
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>>> Again, this patch does not qualify as a fix.
>>>
>>
>> But as I said, the following one is a fix and require that one, you told
>> me to add stable in Cc: to make it explicit it was to go into stable.
> Yes, but you should remove the Fixes tag.
> And probably replace "Next patch" with the commit headline.
> 
>> If someone tries to merge following one into stable with taking that one
>> first, build will fail.
> This shouldn't happen, order from main tree should be preserved.
> 

When they pick up fixes, AFAIK they don't take all the preceeding commits.

But ok, I'll resend.

Christophe