[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a71e670-7943-6bce-ba61-3f020fd9450d@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:42:50 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: <mkumard@...dia.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: tegra: add ACONNECT, ADMA and AGIC nodes
On 13/06/2019 10:10, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Add DT nodes for following devices on Tegra186 and Tegra194
> * ACONNECT
> * ADMA
> * AGIC
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
> ---
> changes in current revision
> * use single address range for all APE modules
> * fix address range for agic
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
> index 426ac0b..b4d735e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
> @@ -1295,4 +1295,71 @@
> (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> };
> +
> + aconnect@...1000 {
This address does not look correct. This appears to be the address of
the AGIC. I think it should be 2900000, however, I also wonder if we
should even bother with an address for the aconnect as this is just a
bus and we don't specific a 'reg' property.
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-aconnect";
> + clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_APE>,
> + <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_APB2APE>;
> + clock-names = "ape", "apb2ape";
> + power-domains = <&bpmp TEGRA186_POWER_DOMAIN_AUD>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0x02900000 0x0 0x02900000 0x1FFFFF>;
This should be 0x1fffff.
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + dma-controller@...0000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-adma";
> + reg = <0x02930000 0x50000>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&agic>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_AHUB>;
> + clock-names = "d_audio";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + agic: agic@...1000 {
I think that this should also be "agic: interrupt-controller@...x" to
conform with standard names. Sorry the Tegra210 version is not the best
reference!
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists