[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6379ecd2-2a31-3362-6b1e-67913ba781da@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:15:30 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shhuiw@...mail.com" <shhuiw@...mail.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu check
On 6/13/19 3:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:54:45AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/12/19 3:47 AM, Stephen Bates wrote:
>>>> Aargh. My original patch [1] handled that correctly, and this case was
>>>> explicitly called out in the commit message, which was retained even
>>>> when the patch was "simplified". That's rather disappointing. :/
>>>
>>> It looks like Jens did a fix for this (44a9bd18a0f06bba
>>> " io_uring: fix failure to verify SQ_AFF cpu") which is in the 5.2-rc series
>>> but which hasn’t been applied to the stable series yet. I am not sure how
>>> I missed that but it makes my patch redundant.
>>>
>>> Jens, will 44a9bd18a0f06bba be applied to stable kernels?
>>
>> Yes, we can get it flagged for stable. Greg, can you pull in the above
>> commit for 5.1 stable?
>
> Now snuck in for the next 5.1.y release, thanks.
Thanks Greg!
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists