linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3c9138e-bf3b-0851-a63e-f52f926d5ed8@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:54:45 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "shhuiw@...mail.com" <shhuiw@...mail.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu check

On 6/12/19 3:47 AM, Stephen  Bates wrote:
>> Aargh. My original patch [1] handled that correctly, and this case was
>> explicitly called out in the commit message, which was retained even
>> when the patch was "simplified". That's rather disappointing. :/
>    
> It looks like Jens did a fix for this (44a9bd18a0f06bba
> " io_uring: fix failure to verify SQ_AFF cpu") which is in the 5.2-rc series
> but which hasn’t been applied to the stable series yet. I am not sure how
> I missed that but it makes my patch redundant.
> 
> Jens, will 44a9bd18a0f06bba be applied to stable kernels?

Yes, we can get it flagged for stable. Greg, can you pull in the above
commit for 5.1 stable?


-- 
Jens Axboe