[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5084acfa-59a4-996f-bb1d-69fbbac01b87@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:12:56 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf cgroups: Don't rotate events for cgroups
unnecessarily
On 6/1/2019 4:27 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Currently perf_rotate_context assumes that if the context's nr_events !=
> nr_active a rotation is necessary for perf event multiplexing. With
> cgroups, nr_events is the total count of events for all cgroups and
> nr_active will not include events in a cgroup other than the current
> task's. This makes rotation appear necessary for cgroups when it is not.
>
> Add a perf_event_context flag that is set when rotation is necessary.
> Clear the flag during sched_out and set it when a flexible sched_in
> fails due to resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/events/core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 15a82ff0aefe..7ab6c251aa3d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -747,6 +747,11 @@ struct perf_event_context {
> int nr_stat;
> int nr_freq;
> int rotate_disable;
> + /*
> + * Set when nr_events != nr_active, except tolerant to events not
> + * needing to be active due to scheduling constraints, such as cgroups.
> + */
> + int rotate_necessary;
It looks like the rotate_necessary is only useful for cgroup and cpuctx.
Why not move it to struct perf_cpu_context and under #ifdef
CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF?
And rename it cgrp_rotate_necessary?
Thanks,
Kan
> refcount_t refcount;
> struct task_struct *task;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index abbd4b3b96c2..41ae424b9f1d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2952,6 +2952,12 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> if (!ctx->nr_active || !(is_active & EVENT_ALL))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * If we had been multiplexing, no rotations are necessary now no events
> + * are active.
> + */
> + ctx->rotate_necessary = 0;
> +
> perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
> if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
> list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &ctx->pinned_active, active_list)
> @@ -3325,6 +3331,15 @@ static int flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
> sid->can_add_hw = 0;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If the group wasn't scheduled then set that multiplexing is necessary
> + * for the context. Note, this won't be set if the event wasn't
> + * scheduled due to event_filter_match failing due to the earlier
> + * return.
> + */
> + if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
> + sid->ctx->rotate_necessary = 1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3690,24 +3705,17 @@ ctx_first_active(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> static bool perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> {
> struct perf_event *cpu_event = NULL, *task_event = NULL;
> - bool cpu_rotate = false, task_rotate = false;
> - struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
> + struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = NULL;
> + int cpu_rotate, task_rotate;
>
> /*
> * Since we run this from IRQ context, nobody can install new
> * events, thus the event count values are stable.
> */
>
> - if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events) {
> - if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events != cpuctx->ctx.nr_active)
> - cpu_rotate = true;
> - }
> -
> - ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> - if (ctx && ctx->nr_events) {
> - if (ctx->nr_events != ctx->nr_active)
> - task_rotate = true;
> - }
> + cpu_rotate = cpuctx->ctx.rotate_necessary;
> + task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> + task_rotate = task_ctx ? task_ctx->rotate_necessary : 0;
>
> if (!(cpu_rotate || task_rotate))
> return false;
> @@ -3716,7 +3724,7 @@ static bool perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
>
> if (task_rotate)
> - task_event = ctx_first_active(ctx);
> + task_event = ctx_first_active(task_ctx);
> if (cpu_rotate)
> cpu_event = ctx_first_active(&cpuctx->ctx);
>
> @@ -3724,17 +3732,17 @@ static bool perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> * As per the order given at ctx_resched() first 'pop' task flexible
> * and then, if needed CPU flexible.
> */
> - if (task_event || (ctx && cpu_event))
> - ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
> + if (task_event || (task_ctx && cpu_event))
> + ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
> if (cpu_event)
> cpu_ctx_sched_out(cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>
> if (task_event)
> - rotate_ctx(ctx, task_event);
> + rotate_ctx(task_ctx, task_event);
> if (cpu_event)
> rotate_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, cpu_event);
>
> - perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, current);
> + perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx, current);
>
> perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
> perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists