linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 08/81] mem-hotplug: fix node spanned pages when we have a node with only ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190613075649.663475244@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:32:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Linxu Fang <fanglinxu@...wei.com>,
        Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
        Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 08/81] mem-hotplug: fix node spanned pages when we have a node with only ZONE_MOVABLE

[ Upstream commit 299c83dce9ea3a79bb4b5511d2cb996b6b8e5111 ]

342332e6a925 ("mm/page_alloc.c: introduce kernelcore=mirror option") and
later patches rewrote the calculation of node spanned pages.

e506b99696a2 ("mem-hotplug: fix node spanned pages when we have a movable
node"), but the current code still has problems,

When we have a node with only zone_movable and the node id is not zero,
the size of node spanned pages is double added.

That's because we have an empty normal zone, and zone_start_pfn or
zone_end_pfn is not between arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn and
arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn, so we need to use clamp to constrain the
range just like the commit <96e907d13602> (bootmem: Reimplement
__absent_pages_in_range() using for_each_mem_pfn_range()).

e.g.
Zone ranges:
  DMA      [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000ffffff]
  DMA32    [mem 0x0000000001000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
  Normal   [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000023fffffff]
Movable zone start for each node
  Node 0: 0x0000000100000000
  Node 1: 0x0000000140000000
Early memory node ranges
  node   0: [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x000000000009efff]
  node   0: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffdffff]
  node   0: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000013fffffff]
  node   1: [mem 0x0000000140000000-0x000000023fffffff]

node 0 DMA	spanned:0xfff   present:0xf9e   absent:0x61
node 0 DMA32	spanned:0xff000 present:0xbefe0	absent:0x40020
node 0 Normal	spanned:0	present:0	absent:0
node 0 Movable	spanned:0x40000 present:0x40000 absent:0
On node 0 totalpages(node_present_pages): 1048446
node_spanned_pages:1310719
node 1 DMA	spanned:0	    present:0		absent:0
node 1 DMA32	spanned:0	    present:0		absent:0
node 1 Normal	spanned:0x100000    present:0x100000	absent:0
node 1 Movable	spanned:0x100000    present:0x100000	absent:0
On node 1 totalpages(node_present_pages): 2097152
node_spanned_pages:2097152
Memory: 6967796K/12582392K available (16388K kernel code, 3686K rwdata,
4468K rodata, 2160K init, 10444K bss, 5614596K reserved, 0K
cma-reserved)

It shows that the current memory of node 1 is double added.
After this patch, the problem is fixed.

node 0 DMA	spanned:0xfff   present:0xf9e   absent:0x61
node 0 DMA32	spanned:0xff000 present:0xbefe0	absent:0x40020
node 0 Normal	spanned:0	present:0	absent:0
node 0 Movable	spanned:0x40000 present:0x40000 absent:0
On node 0 totalpages(node_present_pages): 1048446
node_spanned_pages:1310719
node 1 DMA	spanned:0	    present:0		absent:0
node 1 DMA32	spanned:0	    present:0		absent:0
node 1 Normal	spanned:0	    present:0		absent:0
node 1 Movable	spanned:0x100000    present:0x100000	absent:0
On node 1 totalpages(node_present_pages): 1048576
node_spanned_pages:1048576
memory: 6967796K/8388088K available (16388K kernel code, 3686K rwdata,
4468K rodata, 2160K init, 10444K bss, 1420292K reserved, 0K
cma-reserved)

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1554178276-10372-1-git-send-email-fanglinxu@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linxu Fang <fanglinxu@...wei.com>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 923deb33bf34..6f71518a4558 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5727,13 +5727,15 @@ static unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
 					unsigned long *zone_end_pfn,
 					unsigned long *ignored)
 {
+	unsigned long zone_low = arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[zone_type];
+	unsigned long zone_high = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[zone_type];
 	/* When hotadd a new node from cpu_up(), the node should be empty */
 	if (!node_start_pfn && !node_end_pfn)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Get the start and end of the zone */
-	*zone_start_pfn = arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[zone_type];
-	*zone_end_pfn = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[zone_type];
+	*zone_start_pfn = clamp(node_start_pfn, zone_low, zone_high);
+	*zone_end_pfn = clamp(node_end_pfn, zone_low, zone_high);
 	adjust_zone_range_for_zone_movable(nid, zone_type,
 				node_start_pfn, node_end_pfn,
 				zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
-- 
2.20.1