[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190613135653.415699001@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:54:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...nel.org, namit@...are.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/percpu, x86/irq: Relax {set,get}_irq_regs()
Nadav reported that since the this_cpu_*() ops got asm-volatile
constraints on, code generation suffered for do_IRQ(), but since this
is all with IRQs disabled we can use __this_cpu_*().
smp_x86_platform_ipi 234 222 -12,+0
smp_kvm_posted_intr_ipi 74 66 -8,+0
smp_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi 86 78 -8,+0
smp_apic_timer_interrupt 292 284 -8,+0
smp_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi 74 66 -8,+0
do_IRQ 195 187 -8,+0
Reported-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs *, irq_re
static inline struct pt_regs *get_irq_regs(void)
{
- return this_cpu_read(irq_regs);
+ return __this_cpu_read(irq_regs);
}
static inline struct pt_regs *set_irq_regs(struct pt_regs *new_regs)
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static inline struct pt_regs *set_irq_re
struct pt_regs *old_regs;
old_regs = get_irq_regs();
- this_cpu_write(irq_regs, new_regs);
+ __this_cpu_write(irq_regs, new_regs);
return old_regs;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists