[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Wuj=gANR2im_o4ZnoLEB+U6FqzKe4noLdQyi1vw+K2xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:26 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Double Lo <double.lo@...ress.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Naveen Gupta <naveen.gupta@...ress.com>,
Madhan Mohan R <madhanmohan.r@...ress.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
brcm80211-dev-list <brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mmc: core: Add sdio_retune_hold_now() and sdio_retune_release()
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:10 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 01:42, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > We want SDIO drivers to be able to temporarily stop retuning when the
> > driver knows that the SDIO card is not in a state where retuning will
> > work (maybe because the card is asleep). We'll move the relevant
> > functions to a place where drivers can call them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> BTW, seems like this series is best funneled via my mmc tree, no? In
> such case, I need acks for the brcmfmac driver patches.
For patch #1 I think it could just go in directly to the wireless
tree. It should be fine to land the rest of the patches separately.
For patch #2 - #5 then what you say makes sense to me. I suppose
you'd want at least a Reviewed-by from Arend and an Ack from Kalle on
the Broadcom patches?
I'd also suggest that we Cc stable explicitly when applying. That's
easy for #2 and #3 since they have a Fixes tag. For #4 and #5 I guess
the question is how far back to go. Maybe Adrian has an opinion here
since I think he's the one who experienced these problems.
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists