[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJoQDkqZO_4XdaQymVW0cJDXVmAPh3uieRkBjoUXeWE1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:33:47 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Actions Semi bindings to jsonschema
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:07 AM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Am 14.06.19 um 19:04 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:44:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:32:23AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> Convert Actions Semi SoC bindings to DT schema format using json-schema.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@...e.de>
> >>> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> >>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> v3:
> >>> - update MAINTAINERS
> >>>
> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.txt | 56 -------------------
> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.yaml | 38 +++++++++++++
> >>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.txt
> >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/actions.yaml
> >>
> >> Ping. Please apply or modify this how you'd prefer. I'm not going to
> >> keep respinning this.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for that Rob.
>
> Well, it was simply not clear whether we were supposed to or not. :)
I thought 'To' you and a single patch should be clear enough.
> > Andreas, are you going to take this patch? Else I'll pick it up (If you
> > want me to do the PR for next cycle)
>
> I had checked that all previous changes to the .txt file were by myself,
> so I would prefer if we not license it under GPLv2-only but under the
> same dual-license (MIT/GPLv2+) as the DTs. That modification would need
> Rob's approval then.
That's fine and dual license is preferred. Can you adjust that when
applying. Note that the preference for schema is (GPL-2.0 OR
BSD-2-Clause), but MIT/GPLv2+ is fine by me.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists