linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Smack: Restore the smackfsdef mount option and add missing prefixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb3749a6-e45b-3e07-27f9-841adf6f4640@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:08:11 -0700
From:   Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, Jose Bollo <jose.bollo@....bzh>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Restore the smackfsdef mount option and add
 missing prefixes

On 6/3/2019 4:07 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 6/3/2019 3:42 PM, James Morris wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 May 2019, David Howells wrote:
>>
>>> Should this go via Al's tree, James's tree, Casey's tree or directly to Linus?
>> If it's specific to one LSM (as this is), via Casey, who can decide to 
>> forward to Al or Linus.
> I would very much appreciate it if Al could send this fix along.
> I am not fully set up for sending directly to Linus.

Al, are you going to take this, or should I find another way
to get it in for 5.2?