[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190614065202.GA8084@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:52:02 +0200
From: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To: "Tan, Ley Foon" <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"lftan.linux@...il.com" <lftan.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: switch nios2 and microblaze to use the generic uncached
segement support
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 06:11:00AM +0000, Tan, Ley Foon wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 07:44 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 09:40:34AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Christoph
> > >
> > > Can this patch in http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.gi
> > > t/sh
> > > ortlog/refs/heads/for-next
> > >
> > > [PATCH 1/2] nios2: use the generic uncached segment support in dma-
> > > direct
> > Hi Ley Foon,
> >
> > I don't understand the above sentence. Does it imply a Reviewed-by?
> Sorry, typo in my previous email.
> Can't find this patch in the git link you provided (for-next branch).
> Did you push the patch?
No, I did not push the microblaze and nios2 patches there. The for-next
patch just has the baseline, you'll need to apply the nios2 on top of
that branch to test it. If it tests good and you are fine with it I'd
like to apply it to that branch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists