[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4913398a9317f240235e45f5d1ad886dd8c7e259.camel@infinera.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:18:57 +0000
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com>
To: "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz"
<Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"sr@...x.de" <sr@...x.de>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: dynamically determine the max
sectors
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 03:23 +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I think this may have got lost in the change of maintainer for mtd.
We need this too, ATM we have a local hack that just changes MAX_SECTORS to 1024
>
> On 22/05/19 12:06 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> > Because PPB unlocking unlocks the whole chip cfi_ppb_unlock() needs to
> > remember the locked status for each sector so it can re-lock the
> > unaddressed sectors. Dynamically calculate the maximum number of sectors
> > rather than using a hardcoded value that is too small for larger chips.
> >
> > Tested with Spansion S29GL01GS11TFI flash device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> > index c8fa5906bdf9..a1a7d334aa82 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> > @@ -2533,8 +2533,6 @@ struct ppb_lock {
> > int locked;
> > };
> >
> > -#define MAX_SECTORS 512
> > -
> > #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK ((void *)1)
> > #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((void *)2)
> > #define DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_GETLOCK ((void *)3)
> > @@ -2633,6 +2631,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> > int i;
> > int sectors;
> > int ret;
> > + int max_sectors;
> >
> > /*
> > * PPB unlocking always unlocks all sectors of the flash chip.
> > @@ -2640,7 +2639,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> > * first check the locking status of all sectors and save
> > * it for future use.
> > */
> > - sect = kcalloc(MAX_SECTORS, sizeof(struct ppb_lock), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + max_sectors = 0;
> > + for (i = 0; i < mtd->numeraseregions; i++)
> > + max_sectors += regions[i].numblocks;
> > +
> > + sect = kcalloc(max_sectors, sizeof(struct ppb_lock), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!sect)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > @@ -2689,9 +2692,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused cfi_ppb_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> > }
> >
> > sectors++;
> > - if (sectors >= MAX_SECTORS) {
> > + if (sectors >= max_sectors) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Only %d sectors for PPB locking supported!\n",
> > - MAX_SECTORS);
> > + max_sectors);
> > kfree(sect);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.infradead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-mtd%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjoakim.tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C32742fa3a7134e77f21908d6f078e67b%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C636960799408384144&sdata=JidMNGuW7GdQO%2FA%2BBs8Q0mnqt%2BWlDUnjsbCRJIDkDvU%3D&reserved=0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists