| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190614111633.GC2586@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:16:33 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] x86/resctrl: Get max rmid and occupancy scale
directly from CPUID instead of cpuinfo_x86
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:51:02PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Although x86_cache_max_rmid and x86_cache_occ_scale are read only once
> during resctrl initialization, they are always stored in cpuinfo_x86 on
> each CPU during run time even if resctrl is not configured.
>
> To save cpuinfo_x86 space and make CPU and resctrl initialization simpler,
> remove the two fields from cpuinfo_x86 and get max rmid and occupancy
> scale directly from CPUID during resctrl initialization. And since each
> known platform that supports resctrl has same max rmid on all CPUs, no
> need to scan all CPUs to find minimum of max rmid values, i.e. getting
> max rmid from CPUID on the current CPU is fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 28 --------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index c34a35c78618..27e875d4ca7d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -99,9 +99,6 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
> /* in KB - valid for CPUS which support this call: */
> unsigned int x86_cache_size;
> int x86_cache_alignment; /* In bytes */
> - /* Cache QoS architectural values: */
> - int x86_cache_max_rmid; /* max index */
> - int x86_cache_occ_scale; /* scale to bytes */
> int x86_power;
> unsigned long loops_per_jiffy;
> /* cpuid returned max cores value: */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 2c57fffebf9b..38e4b1a9005e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -840,22 +840,9 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> c->x86_capability[CPUID_F_0_EDX] = edx;
>
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC)) {
> - /* will be overridden if occupancy monitoring exists */
> - c->x86_cache_max_rmid = ebx;
> -
> /* QoS sub-leaf, EAX=0Fh, ECX=1 */
> cpuid_count(0x0000000F, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> c->x86_capability[CPUID_F_1_EDX] = edx;
> -
> - if ((cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC)) ||
> - ((cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL)) ||
> - (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL)))) {
> - c->x86_cache_max_rmid = ecx;
> - c->x86_cache_occ_scale = ebx;
> - }
> - } else {
> - c->x86_cache_max_rmid = -1;
> - c->x86_cache_occ_scale = -1;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1269,20 +1256,6 @@ static void generic_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static void x86_init_cache_qos(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> -{
> - /*
> - * The heavy lifting of max_rmid and cache_occ_scale are handled
> - * in get_cpu_cap(). Here we just set the max_rmid for the boot_cpu
> - * in case CQM bits really aren't there in this CPU.
> - */
> - if (c != &boot_cpu_data) {
> - boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid =
> - min(boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid,
> - c->x86_cache_max_rmid);
> - }
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Validate that ACPI/mptables have the same information about the
> * effective APIC id and update the package map.
> @@ -1391,7 +1364,6 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> #endif
>
> x86_init_rdrand(c);
> - x86_init_cache_qos(c);
> setup_pku(c);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index e49b77283924..474a7090d2dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ int closids_supported(void);
> void closid_free(int closid);
> int alloc_rmid(void);
> void free_rmid(u32 rmid);
> -int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
> +int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
> void mon_event_count(void *info);
> int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 1573a0a6b525..e9d876c25703 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -617,13 +617,35 @@ static void l3_mon_evt_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
> list_add_tail(&mbm_local_event.list, &r->evt_list);
> }
>
> -int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +static void __init get_cqm_info(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> + /*
> + * At this point, CQM LLC and one of occupancy, MBM total, and
> + * MBM local monitoring features must be supported.
> + */
> + cpuid_count(0x0000000F, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + /* will be overridden if occupancy monitoring exists */
> + r->num_rmid = ebx + 1;
> +
> + cpuid_count(0x0000000F, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
Those CPUID accesses should be done *after* testing features, not
before.
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC))
That is already done in get_rdt_mon_resources() and rdt_mon_features
caches those bits. I think you wanna test QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID in there
and then read CPUID 0xf and set ->num_rmid.
> + r->num_rmid = ecx + 1;
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL) || boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL))
Ditto.
Other than that, I like where this cleanup is going...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists