[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190614113523.GC3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:35:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 26/62] keys/mktme: Move the MKTME payload into a
cache aligned structure
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 05:43:46PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> +/* Copy the payload to the HW programming structure and program this KeyID */
> +static int mktme_program_keyid(int keyid, struct mktme_payload *payload)
> +{
> + struct mktme_key_program *kprog = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + kprog = kmem_cache_zalloc(mktme_prog_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
Why GFP_ATOMIC, afaict neither of the usage is with a spinlock held.
> + if (!kprog)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Hardware programming requires cached aligned struct */
> + kprog->keyid = keyid;
> + kprog->keyid_ctrl = payload->keyid_ctrl;
> + memcpy(kprog->key_field_1, payload->data_key, MKTME_AES_XTS_SIZE);
> + memcpy(kprog->key_field_2, payload->tweak_key, MKTME_AES_XTS_SIZE);
> +
> + ret = MKTME_PROG_SUCCESS; /* Future programming call */
> + kmem_cache_free(mktme_prog_cache, kprog);
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists