linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Disable preemption while setting reenlightenment vector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb9e1645-98c2-4341-d6da-4effa4f57fb1@arista.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:50:51 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Prasanna Panchamukhi <panchamukhi@...sta.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        devel@...uxdriverproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Disable preemption while setting
 reenlightenment vector

On 6/14/19 11:08 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> 
>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void set_hv_tscchange_cb(void (*cb)(void))
>>  	struct hv_reenlightenment_control re_ctrl = {
>>  		.vector = HYPERV_REENLIGHTENMENT_VECTOR,
>>  		.enabled = 1,
>> -		.target_vp = hv_vp_index[smp_processor_id()]
>> +		.target_vp = hv_vp_index[raw_smp_processor_id()]
>>  	};
>>  	struct hv_tsc_emulation_control emu_ctrl = {.enabled = 1};
>>  
> 
> Yes, this should do, thanks! I'd also suggest to leave a comment like
> 	/* 
>          * This function can get preemted and migrate to a different CPU
> 	 * but this doesn't matter. We just need to assign
> 	 * reenlightenment notification to some online CPU. In case this
>          * CPU goes offline, hv_cpu_die() will re-assign it to some
>  	 * other online CPU.
> 	 */

What if the cpu goes down just before wrmsrl()?
I mean, hv_cpu_die() will reassign another cpu, but this thread will be
resumed on some other cpu and will write cpu number which is at that
moment already down?

(probably I miss something)

And I presume it's guaranteed that during hv_cpu_die() no other cpu may
go down:
:	new_cpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
:	re_ctrl.target_vp = hv_vp_index[new_cpu];
:	wrmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_REENLIGHTENMENT_CONTROL, *((u64 *)&re_ctrl));

-- 
          Dima