[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1085273942.3137.1560517301721.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:01:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: carlos <carlos@...hat.com>, Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup
and thread creation (v10)
----- On Jun 14, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com wrote:
> ----- On Jun 14, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Florian Weimer fweimer@...hat.com wrote:
>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>>
>>> * Makefile:
>>>
>>> LIBCPATH=/home/efficios/glibc-test/lib
>>> KERNEL_HEADERS=/home/efficios/git/linux-percpu-dev/usr/include
>>> CFLAGS=-I${KERNEL_HEADERS} -L${LIBCPATH} -Wl,--rpath=${LIBCPATH}
>>> -Wl,--dynamic-linker=${LIBCPATH}/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>>>
>>> all:
>>> gcc ${CFLAGS} -o a a.c
>>> gcc ${CFLAGS} -shared -fPIC -o s.so s.c
>>
>> For me, that does not correctly link against the built libc because the
>> system dynamic loader seeps into the link.
>
> I have the same issue. I tried adding "-B${LIBCPATH}" as well, but it did
> not seem to help. I still have this ldd output:
>
> ldd a
> ./a: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: version `GLIBC_2.30' not found (required by
> ./a)
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fffaa7e9000)
> libc.so.6 => /home/efficios/glibc-test/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fac5d479000)
> /home/efficios/glibc-test/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 =>
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fac5da33000)
>
> Still no luck there. Any idea what compiler/linker flag I am missing ?
>
Actually, even though ldd seems confused, running the program seems to
use the right ld.so:
efficios@...pudjdev:~/test/libc-sym$ ./a
__rseq_handled main: 1 0x55f0ec915020
__rseq_abi.cpu_id main: 28 0x7f54f6c2d4c0
efficios@...pudjdev:~/test/libc-sym$ LD_PRELOAD=./s.so ./a
__rseq_handled s.so: 1 0x557350bc6020
__rseq_abi.cpu_id s.so: -1 0x7fe2f30f2680
__rseq_handled main: 1 0x557350bc6020
__rseq_abi.cpu_id main: 27 0x7fe2f30f2680
But my original issue remains: if I define a variable called __rseq_handled
within either the main executable or the preloaded library, it overshadows
the libc one:
efficios@...pudjdev:~/test/libc-sym$ ./a
__rseq_handled main: 0 0x56135fd5102c
__rseq_abi.cpu_id main: 29 0x7fcbeca6d5a0
efficios@...pudjdev:~/test/libc-sym$ LD_PRELOAD=./s.so ./a
__rseq_handled s.so: 0 0x558f70aeb02c
__rseq_abi.cpu_id s.so: -1 0x7fdca78b7760
__rseq_handled main: 0 0x558f70aeb02c
__rseq_abi.cpu_id main: 27 0x7fdca78b7760
Which is unexpected.
This is with my dev branch at this commit:
https://github.com/compudj/glibc-dev/commit/f0d4e60e5d0ceb0c2642f99da5af61b6ad988531
What am I missing ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists