linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v10)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26171199.3391.1560520033825.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:47:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc:     carlos <carlos@...hat.com>, Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup
 and thread creation (v10)

----- On Jun 14, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Florian Weimer fweimer@...hat.com wrote:

> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
> 
>> +  /* Publicize rseq registration ownership.  This must be performed
>> +     after rtld re-relocation, before invoking constructors of
>> +     preloaded libraries.  */
>> +  rseq_init ();
> 
> Please add a comment that IFUNC resolvers do not see the initialized
> value.  I think this is okay because we currently do not support access
> to extern variables in IFUNC resolvers.

Do IFUNC resolvers happen to observe the __rseq_handled address that
was internal to ld.so ?

If so, we could simply initialize __rseq_handled twice: early before calling
IFUNC resolvers, and after ld.so re-relocation.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com