linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] mpls: fix af

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47f1889a-e919-e3fd-f90c-39c26cb1ccbb@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:07:06 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mpls: fix af_mpls dependencies

On 6/14/19 8:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:41 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On 6/11/19 5:08 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:07 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> * Configure standard kernel features (expert users)
>>> *
>>> Configure standard kernel features (expert users) (EXPERT) [Y/?] y
>>>   Multiple users, groups and capabilities support (MULTIUSER) [Y/n/?] y
>>>   sgetmask/ssetmask syscalls support (SGETMASK_SYSCALL) [N/y/?] n
>>>   Sysfs syscall support (SYSFS_SYSCALL) [N/y/?] n
>>>   Sysctl syscall support (SYSCTL_SYSCALL) [N/y/?] (NEW)
>>
>> So I still say that MPLS_ROUTING should depend on PROC_SYSCTL,
>> not select it.
> 
> It clearly shouldn't select PROC_SYSCTL, but I think it should not
> have a 'depends on' statement either. I think the correct fix for the
> original problem would have been something like
> 
> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> @@ -2659,6 +2659,9 @@ static int mpls_net_init(struct net *net)
>         net->mpls.ip_ttl_propagate = 1;
>         net->mpls.default_ttl = 255;
> 
> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL))
> +               return 0;
> +
>         table = kmemdup(mpls_table, sizeof(mpls_table), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (table == NULL)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
> 

Without sysctl, the entire mpls_router code is disabled. So if sysctl is
not enabled there is no point in building this file.