[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67e4688a-09d5-61a3-7406-a91f55045004@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:25:04 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] clocksource: davinci-timer: new driver
On 14/06/2019 12:39, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 05/06/19 2:03 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>
>> This is another version of the new davinci clocksource driver. After much
>> discussion this contains many changes to simplify and improve the driver.
>
> Does this look good to you now? If yes, can you please merge and provide
> an immutable branch to me so I can merge dependent mach-davinci patches?
Yes, I think it is fine.
http://git@....linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git
timers/drivers/davinci
It is v5.2-rc4 + (2 x patches)
It is merged in clockevents/next which is exported to linux-next and for
kernel-ci.
AFAIU, the patch was compiled and tested. If not, please let me know.
Please, wait a couple of days I confirm the tests passed and you can
consider the branch immutable.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists