linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf pmu: Fix uncore PMU alias list for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:46:56 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, tmricht@...ux.ibm.com,
        brueckner@...ux.ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        ben@...adent.org.uk, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf pmu: Fix uncore PMU alias list for ARM64

Em Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:07:59PM +0800, John Garry escreveu:
> In commit 292c34c10249 ("perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86
> platform"), we fixed the issue of CPU events being aliased to uncore
> events.
> 
> Fix this same issue for ARM64, since the said commit left the (broken)
> behaviour untouched for ARM64.

So I added:

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 292c34c10249 ("perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform")

So that the stable trees get this fix and add it to the versions where
it should have been together with the x86 fix, ok?

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index f2eff272279b..7e7299fee550 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -709,9 +709,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	struct pmu_events_map *map;
> -	struct pmu_event *pe;
>  	const char *name = pmu->name;
> -	const char *pname;
>  
>  	map = perf_pmu__find_map(pmu);
>  	if (!map)
> @@ -722,28 +720,26 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>  	 */
>  	i = 0;
>  	while (1) {
> +		const char *cpu_name = is_arm_pmu_core(name) ? name : "cpu";
> +		struct pmu_event *pe = &map->table[i++];
> +		const char *pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : cpu_name;
>  
> -		pe = &map->table[i++];
>  		if (!pe->name) {
>  			if (pe->metric_group || pe->metric_name)
>  				continue;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!is_arm_pmu_core(name)) {
> -			pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : "cpu";
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * uncore alias may be from different PMU
> -			 * with common prefix
> -			 */
> -			if (pmu_is_uncore(name) &&
> -			    !strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
> -				goto new_alias;
> +		/*
> +		 * uncore alias may be from different PMU
> +		 * with common prefix
> +		 */
> +		if (pmu_is_uncore(name) &&
> +		    !strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
> +			goto new_alias;
>  
> -			if (strcmp(pname, name))
> -				continue;
> -		}
> +		if (strcmp(pname, name))
> +			continue;
>  
>  new_alias:
>  		pr_err("%s new_alias name=%s pe->name=%s\n", __func__, name, pe->name);
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 

- Arnaldo