[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190614145001.GB9088@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:50:01 +0200
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] dma-mapping: use exact allocation in
dma_alloc_contiguous
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:15:44PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Does this still guarantee that requests for 16k will not cross a 16k boundary?
> It looks like you are losing the alignment parameter.
The DMA API never gave you alignment guarantees to start with,
and you can get not naturally aligned memory from many of our
current implementations.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists