| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:24:36 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tpm_tis_core: add optional max xfer size check
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> From: Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>
>
> If tpm reports a bigger burstcnt than allowed by the physical protocol,
> set burstcnt to the max allowed value.
>
> In practice, seen in case of xfer issues (e.g. in spi interface case,
> lost header causing flow control issues and wrong values returned on read
> from TPM_STS). Without catching, causes the physical layer to reject xfer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> [swboyd@...omium.org: Drop extra parenthesis in if statement]
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists