lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:20:27 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/cpufeatures: Combine word 11 and 12 into new
 scattered features word 11

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 08:24:58AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 07:39:12AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > KVM can't handle Linux-defined leafs without extra tricks
> > > 
> > > and that's what I'm proposing - an extra trick.
> > 
> > It's not a trick, it's bug suppression.
> > 
> > Try running a kernel built with only patches 1/2 and 2/2 applied, along
> > with KVM's assertions removed.  It'll probably boot fine since most of the
> > affected features are option things, but Linux's feature reporting will be
> > all kinds of screwed up.
> > 
> > E.g. this WARN triggers because CPUID_7_EDX is 17, not 18 as expected,
> 
> We can decrement NCAPINTS and word 18 in the header. The BUILD_BUG_ONs
> should not fire then too.
> 
> But the easier thing is to not remove any defines in the enum
> cpuid_leafs thing so that the capabilities array has the proper size for
> after patch 2.

Agreed, Fenghua's proposed CPUID_DUMMY is way easier.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists