lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:26:47 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, <nm@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>,
        <ssantosh@...nel.org>, <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used variable
 'dev'

On 6/14/19 10:44 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
> 
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Thanks for the fix.

> 
> It is never used since commit 1e407f337f40 ("firmware:
> ti_sci: Add support for processor control")

Warnings are actually introduced in commit 68608b5e5063 ("firmware:
ti_sci: Add resource management APIs for ringacc, psi-l and udma").

While this patch fixes the warnings as well, I suggest to replace the
dev_dbg/dev_err traces in these functions to use the dev variable
instead of info->dev, to be consistent with the usage in the rest of the
file.

regards
Suman

> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 86b2727..8c1a961 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2032,14 +2032,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>  	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
>  	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
>  	struct ti_sci_info *info;
> -	struct device *dev;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> -	dev = info->dev;
>  
>  	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_CFG,
>  				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2101,14 +2099,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>  	struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_get_cfg_req *req;
>  	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
>  	struct ti_sci_info *info;
> -	struct device *dev;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> -	dev = info->dev;
>  
>  	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_GET_CFG,
>  				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2284,14 +2280,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>  	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
>  	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
>  	struct ti_sci_info *info;
> -	struct device *dev;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> -	dev = info->dev;
>  
>  	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_TX_CH_CFG,
>  				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> @@ -2354,14 +2348,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>  	struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
>  	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
>  	struct ti_sci_info *info;
> -	struct device *dev;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
> -	dev = info->dev;
>  
>  	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_RX_CH_CFG,
>  				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists