[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190616161830.29b42440@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:18:30 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org>
Cc: Shobhit Kukreti <shobhitkukreti@...il.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: humidity: Replace older GPIO APIs with GPIO
Consumer APIs for the dht11 sensor
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:30:42 +0200
Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org> wrote:
> Shobhit Kukreti writes:
> > The dht11 driver uses a single gpio to make measurements. It was
> > using the older global gpio numberspace. The patch replaces the
> > old gpio api with the new gpio descriptor based api.
> >
> > Removed header files "linux/gpio.h" and "linux/of_gpio.h"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kukreti <shobhitkukreti@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> > index c815920..f5128d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/dht11.c
> > @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > @@ -72,7 +71,7 @@
> > struct dht11 {
> > struct device *dev;
> >
> > - int gpio;
> > + struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
> > int irq;
> >
> > struct completion completion;
> > @@ -179,7 +178,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dht11_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > if (dht11->num_edges < DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ && dht11->num_edges >= 0) {
> > dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges].ts = ktime_get_boot_ns();
> > dht11->edges[dht11->num_edges++].value =
> > - gpio_get_value(dht11->gpio);
> > + gpiod_get_value(dht11->gpiod);
> >
> > if (dht11->num_edges >= DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ)
> > complete(&dht11->completion);
> > @@ -217,12 +216,12 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> > reinit_completion(&dht11->completion);
> >
> > dht11->num_edges = 0;
> > - ret = gpio_direction_output(dht11->gpio, 0);
> > + ret = gpiod_direction_output(dht11->gpiod, 0);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err;
> > usleep_range(DHT11_START_TRANSMISSION_MIN,
> > DHT11_START_TRANSMISSION_MAX);
> > - ret = gpio_direction_input(dht11->gpio);
> > + ret = gpiod_direction_input(dht11->gpiod);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err;
> >
> > @@ -294,10 +293,8 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dht11_dt_ids);
> > static int dht11_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > - struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > struct dht11 *dht11;
> > struct iio_dev *iio;
> > - int ret;
> >
> > iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*dht11));
> > if (!iio) {
> > @@ -307,18 +304,13 @@ static int dht11_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > dht11 = iio_priv(iio);
> > dht11->dev = dev;
> > + dht11->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, GPIOD_IN);
> > + if (IS_ERR(dht11->gpiod))
> > + return PTR_ERR(dht11->gpiod);
> >
> > - ret = of_get_gpio(node, 0);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > - dht11->gpio = ret;
> > - ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, dht11->gpio, GPIOF_IN, pdev->name);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - dht11->irq = gpio_to_irq(dht11->gpio);
> > + dht11->irq = gpiod_to_irq(dht11->gpiod);
> > if (dht11->irq < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "GPIO %d has no interrupt\n", dht11->gpio);
> > + dev_err(dev, "GPIO %d has no interrupt\n", desc_to_gpio(dht11->gpiod));
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists