linux-kernel - Re: general protection fault in oom_unkillable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <840fa9f1-07e2-e206-2fc0-725392f96baf@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:37:56 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+d0fc9d3c166bc5e4a94b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        yuzhoujian@...ichuxing.com
Subject: Re: general protection fault in oom_unkillable_task

On 2019/06/16 6:33, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2019/06/16 3:50, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>> While dump_tasks() traverses only each thread group, mem_cgroup_scan_tasks()
>>> traverses each thread.
>>
>> I think mem_cgroup_scan_tasks() traversing threads is not intentional
>> and css_task_iter_start in it should use CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS as the
>> oom killer only cares about the processes or more specifically
>> mm_struct (though two different thread groups can have same mm_struct
>> but that is fine).
> 
> We can't use CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS from mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(). I've tried
> CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS in an attempt to evaluate only one thread from each
> thread group, but I found that CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS causes skipping whole
> threads in a thread group (and trivially allowing "Out of memory and no
> killable processes...\n" flood) if thread group leader has already exited.

Seems that CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS from mem_cgroup_scan_tasks() is now working.
Maybe I was confused due to without commit 7775face207922ea ("memcg: killed
threads should not invoke memcg OOM killer"). We can scan one thread from
each thread group, and remove

	/* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */
	if (points == oc->chosen_points && thread_group_leader(oc->chosen))
		goto next;

check.