[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d668acbce4cc9759cc940f56016dc9437df5441.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:13:11 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Shobhit Kukreti <shobhitkukreti@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: Resolve checkpatch error "that
open brace { should be on the previous line" in the rtl8723 driver
On Sat, 2019-06-15 at 14:29 -0700, Shobhit Kukreti wrote:
> Cleaned up the code from the following files to get rid of
> check patch error "that open brace { should be on the previous line"
It's fine you are modifying brace styles, but:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> index aa2499f..4631b68 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
> @@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ void rtw_os_indicate_connect(struct adapter *adapter)
> struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &(adapter->mlmepriv);
>
> if ((check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_MASTER_STATE) == true) ||
> - (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_STATE) == true))
> - {
> + (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_ADHOC_STATE) == true)) {
> rtw_cfg80211_ibss_indicate_connect(adapter);
> }
> else
the else should be on the same line as the close brace
> @@ -106,8 +105,9 @@ void rtw_reset_securitypriv(struct adapter *adapter)
> adapter->securitypriv.ndisencryptstatus = Ndis802_11WEPDisabled;
>
> }
> - else /* reset values in securitypriv */
> - {
> + else {
> + /* reset values in securitypriv */
> +
and here. etc. Please change all instances appropriately.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists