[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906161038160.1760@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:39:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 18/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Add documentation for
FSGSBASE
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019, Bae, Chang Seok wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 13:07, Bae, Chang Seok <chang.seok.bae@...el.com<mailto:chang.seok.bae@...el.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2019, at 23:54, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de<mailto:tglx@...utronix.de>> wrote:
>
> +The GS segment has no common use and can be used freely by
> +applications. There is no storage class specifier similar to __thread which
> +would cause the compiler to use GS based addressing modes. Newer versions
> +of GCC and Clang support GS based addressing via address space identifiers.
> +
>
> …
>
> +
> +Clang does not provide these address space identifiers, but it provides
> +an attribute based mechanism:
> +
>
> These two sentences seem to conflict with each other; Clang needs to be clarified
> above.
>
> Thanks for the write-up. Just preparing v8 right now. Will send out shortly.
Please dont. Send me a delta patch against the documentation. I have queued
all the other patches already internally. I did not push it out because I
wanted to have proper docs.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists