| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1823986.m04BvQ5ALy@jernej-laptop>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 13:05:13 +0200
From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To: linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, megous@...ous.com
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v6 5/6] drm: sun4i: Add support for enabling DDC I2C bus to sun8i_dw_hdmi glue
Hi Ondrej!
Dne ponedeljek, 27. maj 2019 ob 18:22:36 CEST je megous via linux-sunxi
napisal(a):
> From: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
>
> Orange Pi 3 board requires enabling a voltage shifting circuit via GPIO
> for the DDC bus to be usable.
>
> Add support for hdmi-connector node's optional ddc-en-gpios property to
> support this use case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.h | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c index 39d8509d96a0..59b81ba02d96
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,30 @@ static u32 sun8i_dw_hdmi_find_possible_crtcs(struct
> drm_device *drm, return crtcs;
> }
>
> +static int sun8i_dw_hdmi_find_connector_pdev(struct device *dev,
> + struct
platform_device **pdev_out)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + struct device_node *remote;
> +
> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->of_node, 1, -1);
> + if (!remote)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(remote, "hdmi-connector")) {
> + of_node_put(remote);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(remote);
> + of_node_put(remote);
> + if (!pdev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + *pdev_out = pdev;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int sun8i_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> void *data)
> {
> @@ -151,16 +175,29 @@ static int sun8i_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev,
> struct device *master, return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regulator);
> }
>
> + ret = sun8i_dw_hdmi_find_connector_pdev(dev, &hdmi->connector_pdev);
> + if (!ret) {
> + hdmi->ddc_en = gpiod_get_optional(&hdmi->connector_pdev-
>dev,
> + "ddc-en",
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(hdmi->ddc_en)) {
> + platform_device_put(hdmi->connector_pdev);
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get ddc-en gpio\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(hdmi->ddc_en);
> + }
> + }
> +
> ret = regulator_enable(hdmi->regulator);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable regulator\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto err_unref_ddc_en;
> }
>
> + gpiod_set_value(hdmi->ddc_en, 1);
Why don't you do that inside if clause where hdmi->ddc_en is assigned? It's
not useful otherwise anyway.
Besides, you would then only need to adjust one goto label in error path.
> +
> ret = reset_control_deassert(hdmi->rst_ctrl);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Could not deassert ctrl reset
control\n");
> - goto err_disable_regulator;
> + goto err_disable_ddc_en;
> }
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(hdmi->clk_tmds);
> @@ -213,8 +250,14 @@ static int sun8i_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev,
> struct device *master, clk_disable_unprepare(hdmi->clk_tmds);
> err_assert_ctrl_reset:
> reset_control_assert(hdmi->rst_ctrl);
> -err_disable_regulator:
> +err_disable_ddc_en:
> + gpiod_set_value(hdmi->ddc_en, 0);
> regulator_disable(hdmi->regulator);
> +err_unref_ddc_en:
> + if (hdmi->ddc_en)
> + gpiod_put(hdmi->ddc_en);
> +
> + platform_device_put(hdmi->connector_pdev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -228,7 +271,13 @@ static void sun8i_dw_hdmi_unbind(struct device *dev,
> struct device *master, sun8i_hdmi_phy_remove(hdmi);
> clk_disable_unprepare(hdmi->clk_tmds);
> reset_control_assert(hdmi->rst_ctrl);
> + gpiod_set_value(hdmi->ddc_en, 0);
> regulator_disable(hdmi->regulator);
> +
> + if (hdmi->ddc_en)
> + gpiod_put(hdmi->ddc_en);
> +
> + platform_device_put(hdmi->connector_pdev);
> }
>
> static const struct component_ops sun8i_dw_hdmi_ops = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.h index 720c5aa8adc1..dad66b8301c2
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.h>
> #include <drm/drm_encoder.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> @@ -190,6 +191,8 @@ struct sun8i_dw_hdmi {
> struct regulator *regulator;
> const struct sun8i_dw_hdmi_quirks *quirks;
> struct reset_control *rst_ctrl;
> + struct platform_device *connector_pdev;
It seems that connector_pdev is needed only during intialization. Why do you
store it?
Best regards,
Jernej
> + struct gpio_desc *ddc_en;
> };
>
> static inline struct sun8i_dw_hdmi *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists