[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190617181115.GC3927@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:11:15 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Don't hardcode host include path for libslang
Em Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:46:05AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:39:47AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Hardcoding /usr/include/slang is fundamentally incompatible with cross
> > compilation and will lead to the inability for a cross-compiled
> > environment to properly detect whether slang is available or not.
> >
> > If /usr/include/slang is necessary that is a distribution specific
> > knowledge that could be solved with either a standard pkg-config .pc
> > file (which slang has) or simply overriding CFLAGS accordingly, but the
> > default perf Makefile should be clean of all of that.
>
> fedora 30 is ok with this, I guess acme's distro test will
> tell us about the rest ;-)
Seems to be just needless old cruft:
[perfbuilder@...3ebde35eb /]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
[perfbuilder@...3ebde35eb /]$
[perfbuilder@...3ebde35eb /]$ ls -la /usr/include/slang.h
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 87562 Apr 11 2011 /usr/include/slang.h
[perfbuilder@...3ebde35eb /]$ ls -la /usr/include/slang/slang.h
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Jun 17 16:41 /usr/include/slang/slang.h -> ../slang.h
[perfbuilder@...3ebde35eb /]$
So I'm removing that comment:
> > # Fedora has /usr/include/slang/slang.h, but ubuntu /usr/include/slang.h
And adding a:
Fixes: ef7b93a11904 ("perf report: Librarize the annotation code and use it in the newt browser")
Will do a build with all the containers and check that the output for
all the ones with the slang devel package installed have slang
successfully detected.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
> jirka
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > ---
> > tools/build/feature/Makefile | 2 +-
> > tools/perf/Makefile.config | 1 -
2> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/build/feature/Makefile b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> > index 4b8244ee65ce..f9432d21eff9 100644
> > --- a/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/build/feature/Makefile
> > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)test-libaudit.bin:
> > $(BUILD) -laudit
> >
> > $(OUTPUT)test-libslang.bin:
> > - $(BUILD) -I/usr/include/slang -lslang
> > + $(BUILD) -lslang
> >
> > $(OUTPUT)test-libcrypto.bin:
> > $(BUILD) -lcrypto
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> > index 85fbcd265351..b11134fdf59f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
> > @@ -641,7 +641,6 @@ ifndef NO_SLANG
> > NO_SLANG := 1
> > else
> > # Fedora has /usr/include/slang/slang.h, but ubuntu /usr/include/slang.h
> > - CFLAGS += -I/usr/include/slang
> > CFLAGS += -DHAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
> > EXTLIBS += -lslang
> > $(call detected,CONFIG_SLANG)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists