[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-929afa0092d0ea6be2fbd0ac087319092595eba6@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:49:20 -0700
From: tip-bot for Adrian Hunter <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf time-utils: Make perf_time__parse_for_ranges()
more logical
Commit-ID: 929afa0092d0ea6be2fbd0ac087319092595eba6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/929afa0092d0ea6be2fbd0ac087319092595eba6
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:00:15 +0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:20:12 -0300
perf time-utils: Make perf_time__parse_for_ranges() more logical
Explicit time ranges never contain a percent sign whereas percentage
ranges always do, so it is possible to call the correct parser.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604130017.31207-18-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 9a463752dba8..d942840356e3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
int *range_size, int *range_num)
{
+ bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%');
struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range;
int size, num, ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
if (!ptime_range)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str) != 0) {
+ if (has_percent) {
if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 &&
session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) {
pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf data.\n"
@@ -427,6 +428,8 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
if (num < 0)
goto error_invalid;
} else {
+ if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str))
+ goto error_invalid;
num = 1;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists