linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <692e328c-3d4a-c39c-0e6d-ba86828c6b41@126.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:56:25 +0800
From:   Shuaibing Lu <shuaibinglu@....com>
To:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc:     ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized

在 2019/6/13 下午7:10, Dominique Martinet 写道:
> Lu Shuaibing wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2019:
>> The p9_tag_alloc() does not initialize the transport error t_err field.
>> The struct p9_req_t *req is allocated and stored in a struct p9_client
>> variable. The field t_err is never initialized before p9_conn_cancel()
>> checks its value.
>>
>> KUMSAN(KernelUninitializedMemorySantizer, a new error detection tool)
>> reports this bug.
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KUMSAN: use of uninitialized memory in p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f9b600c by task kworker/1:2/1216
>>
>> CPU: 1 PID: 1216 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc4+ #28
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>> Workqueue: events p9_write_work
>> Call Trace:
>>  dump_stack+0x75/0xae
>>  __kumsan_report+0x17c/0x3e6
>>  kumsan_report+0xe/0x20
>>  p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
>>  p9_write_work+0x183/0x4a0
>>  process_one_work+0x4d1/0x8c0
>>  worker_thread+0x6e/0x780
>>  kthread+0x1ca/0x1f0
>>  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>
>> Allocated by task 1979:
>>  save_stack+0x19/0x80
>>  __kumsan_kmalloc.constprop.3+0xbc/0x120
>>  kmem_cache_alloc+0xa7/0x170
>>  p9_client_prepare_req.part.9+0x3b/0x380
>>  p9_client_rpc+0x15e/0x880
>>  p9_client_create+0x3d0/0xac0
>>  v9fs_session_init+0x192/0xc80
>>  v9fs_mount+0x67/0x470
>>  legacy_get_tree+0x70/0xd0
>>  vfs_get_tree+0x4a/0x1c0
>>  do_mount+0xba9/0xf90
>>  ksys_mount+0xa8/0x120
>>  __x64_sys_mount+0x62/0x70
>>  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1e0
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>
>> Freed by task 0:
>> (stack is not available)
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88805f9b6008
>>  which belongs to the cache p9_req_t of size 144
>> The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of
>>  144-byte region [ffff88805f9b6008, ffff88805f9b6098)
>> The buggy address belongs to the page:
>> page:ffffea00017e6d80 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888068b63740 index:0xffff88805f9b7d90 compound_mapcount: 0
>> flags: 0x100000000010200(slab|head)
>> raw: 0100000000010200 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b63740
>> raw: ffff88805f9b7d90 0000000000100001 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
>> page dumped because: kumsan: bad access detected
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Shuaibing <shuaibinglu@....com>
> Looks good to me, will queue it up for -next after I've had time to run
> some tests - probably early next week.
>
> This made me realize that this refcount_set is too late, it is possible
> in theory to find the request with p9_tag_lookup as soon as the tag
> alloc worked so both this req->t_err and refcount initialization should
> go before the idr chunk with the other field initializations.
>
> I also checked by the way that no other fields were forgotten, the only
> field that is not initialized now is ->aux, but that field is never used
> so it might be just as fast to remove the field instead...
> I'll submit a couple of patches to move these two inits up and remove
> the aux field when I find time.
>
>
> Thanks!

Thanks for your reply. The kumsan tool finds only one field is used
initialized. The ->aux field could

be replaced.