[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190617212518.GN17551@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:25:18 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: mvebu: Add compatible string for
98dx1135 core clock
> That list would be the same as the Kirkwood/Dove. I thought about adding
> it but decided not to to avoid unnecessary duplication. One compromise
> would be to change "for 98dx1135 SoC core clocks" to "for Kirkwood
> 98dx1135 SoC" which would fit with the MV88f6180 line above and make it
> clear that it falls into the kirkwood bucket.
Hi Chris
The Compromise sounds good.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists