linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: fix the get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:54:31 +0200
From:   Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>, <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
        <fabien.dessenne@...com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        <alexandre.torgue@...com>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: fix the get_irq error cases

On 6/14/19 10:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Fabrice,
> 
>> +		return irq_event ? irq_event : -ENODEV;
> 
> Maybe -ENOENT instead of -ENODEV? I mean you have a dev_err there, so
> the driver core should probably also complain?
> 
> You could also shorten the ternary operator to:
> 
> 	return irq_event ? : -E<whatyouprefer>;
> 
> However, both are minor nits. If you prefer to keep the patch as is,
> fine with me.

Hi Wolfram,

Thanks for reviewing,
I've sent a v3 with your suggestions.

Regards,
Fabrice
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Wolfram
>