[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190617091357.GF27127@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:13:57 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/resctrl: Get max rmid and occupancy scale
directly from CPUID instead of cpuinfo_x86
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:35:02AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Is this OK? Or the patch 0002 is unnecessary?
One patch: carve out and move it where you think it should belong.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists