[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190617092108.GA18020@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:21:08 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rgummal@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Fix Multi MSI data programming
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:47:59PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> The current Multi MSI data programming fails if multiple end points
> requesting MSI and multi MSI are connected with switch, i.e the current
> multi MSI data being given is not considering the number of vectors
> being requested in case of multi MSI.
> Ex: Two EP's connected via switch, EP1 requesting single MSI first,
> EP2 requesting Multi MSI of count four. The current code gives
> MSI data 0x0 to EP1 and 0x1 to EP2, but EP2 can modify lower two bits
> due to which EP2 also sends interrupt with MSI data 0x0 which results
> in always invoking virq of EP1 due to which EP2 MSI interrupt never
> gets handled.
>
> Fix Multi MSI data programming with required alignment by
> using number of vectors being requested.
>
> Fixes: ab597d35ef11 ("PCI: xilinx-nwl: Add support for Xilinx NWL PCIe
> Host Controller")
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
> ---
> V4:
> - Using a different bitmap registration API whcih serves single and multi
> MSI requests.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied to pci/xilinx for v5.3, please have a look and check if
the commit log I wrote provides a clear description of the issue.
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> index 81538d7..a9e07b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -483,15 +483,13 @@ static int nwl_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
> - bit = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(msi->bitmap, INT_PCI_MSI_NR, 0,
> - nr_irqs, 0);
> - if (bit >= INT_PCI_MSI_NR) {
> + bit = bitmap_find_free_region(msi->bitmap, INT_PCI_MSI_NR,
> + get_count_order(nr_irqs));
> + if (bit < 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
>
> - bitmap_set(msi->bitmap, bit, nr_irqs);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, bit + i, &nwl_irq_chip,
> domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> @@ -509,7 +507,8 @@ static void nwl_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> struct nwl_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
>
> mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
> - bitmap_clear(msi->bitmap, data->hwirq, nr_irqs);
> + bitmap_release_region(msi->bitmap, data->hwirq,
> + get_count_order(nr_irqs));
> mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists