[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906171357160.1854@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 13:58:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
jikos@...nel.org, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] stacktrace: Remove weak version of
save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable()
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sun 2019-06-16 10:44:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >
> > > Recent rework of stack trace infrastructure introduced a new set of
> > > helpers for common stack trace operations (commit e9b98e162aa5
> > > ("stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations") and
> > > related). As a result, save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() is not directly
> > > called anywhere. Livepatch, currently the only user of the reliable
> > > stack trace feature, now calls stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable().
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Would you like to push this patch via your tree?
> Or is it OK to push it via the livepatch tree for 5.3?
Just pick it up. I don't think we have anything conflicting.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists