lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 13:58:36 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        jikos@...nel.org, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
        kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] stacktrace: Remove weak version of
 save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable()

On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sun 2019-06-16 10:44:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > 
> > > Recent rework of stack trace infrastructure introduced a new set of
> > > helpers for common stack trace operations (commit e9b98e162aa5
> > > ("stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations") and
> > > related). As a result, save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() is not directly
> > > called anywhere. Livepatch, currently the only user of the reliable
> > > stack trace feature, now calls stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable().
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> Would you like to push this patch via your tree?
> Or is it OK to push it via the livepatch tree for 5.3?

Just pick it up. I don't think we have anything conflicting.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ